Well, the model FINALLY arrived. Geeze. 14,124 surface bodies.
As suggested, above I'm going to remodel a very limited subset of the interface areas as necessary and call this done.
I could spend the rest of my life on this.....
Thanks all who chimed in.
Search found 64 matches
- Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:30 am
- Forum: How To Questions
- Topic: Turning assemblies saved as part with surfaces into useful solids
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3400
- Tue Nov 09, 2021 9:19 am
- Forum: How To Questions
- Topic: Turning assemblies saved as part with surfaces into useful solids
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3400
Re: Turning assemblies saved as part with surfaces into useful solids
Wow! Lot's of good responses. Sorry, was off doing something else and forgot about this thread. Agreed, the easiest solution is to get a real model. Unfortunately they want a lot of $ for that and management doesn't see the value.... My time is seen as "free".... grumble. Sorry not able to...
- Fri Nov 05, 2021 7:31 am
- Forum: How To Questions
- Topic: Turning assemblies saved as part with surfaces into useful solids
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3400
Turning assemblies saved as part with surfaces into useful solids
So, When the genius' at my company wrote the PO for the design and construction of a piece of equipment that we will include in a larger system, they neglected to include fully functional solid models as a deliverable.... The vendor balked at the request of providing a full model, but did provide th...
- Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:59 pm
- Forum: API
- Topic: What are some different ways to bring outside information into SW properties
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2270
Re: What are some different ways to bring outside information into SW properties
My favorite trick is to directly edit custom properties from Excel with user-defined functions, without having to open SW at all (via Document Manager API). https://www.codestack.net/solidworks-document-manager-api/ https://www.codestack.net/solidworks-document-manager-api/document/data-storage/cus...
- Mon Oct 18, 2021 3:23 pm
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: Inserting a sequence of numbers in a sketch
- Replies: 2
- Views: 454
Re: Inserting a sequence of numbers in a sketch
Wow. That's brilliant. Yes, thanks!mike miller wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:54 am Does this help you? https://www.cadforum.net/viewtopic.php? ... 85&p=13065
Kudos to @MJuric.
- Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:22 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: Inserting a sequence of numbers in a sketch
- Replies: 2
- Views: 454
Inserting a sequence of numbers in a sketch
Hiya, I do a lot of work with ship layout and one of the basic layout items for all ship systems is a baseline sketch defining the frame spacing. The layout of the actual spacing is easy enough, but it would be AWESOME if I could generate a sequence of text labels to call out the frame numbers. As t...
- Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:42 pm
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: Weird STEP import phenomena
- Replies: 6
- Views: 900
Re: Weird STEP import phenomena
Dude. You are THE MAN! Have no idea how this got changed.
Thank you!
- Tue Oct 12, 2021 11:59 am
- Forum: SW General
- Topic: Weird STEP import phenomena
- Replies: 6
- Views: 900
Weird STEP import phenomena
So I got a bunch of step files from one of our contractors to use in our assembly model. Importing them into Swx v2019 results in every part having a Sweep inserted in the part on top of the Imported part in the feature manager tree. The Sweep is broken due to relations to elements that no longer ex...
- Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:42 pm
- Forum: How To Questions
- Topic: SolidWorks 2018 IP Protection
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2085
Re: SolidWorks 2018 IP Protection
Hello, I need to send a Pack & Go to a client, however, I want to keep my work to myself. The goal is to send the pack & go with all the solid bodies as "imported" rather than sending the solidparts with all the details. If I use a speedpak, this doesn't allow the client to click ...
- Fri Sep 24, 2021 9:05 am
- Forum: API
- Topic: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1111
Re: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
Got it.....
Thanks to http://joshuaredstone.blogspot.com/2015/
longstatus = win32com.client.VARIANT(pythoncom.VT_BYREF | prythoncom.VT_I4, 1)
jeebus....
Thanks to http://joshuaredstone.blogspot.com/2015/
longstatus = win32com.client.VARIANT(pythoncom.VT_BYREF | prythoncom.VT_I4, 1)
jeebus....
- Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:41 am
- Forum: API
- Topic: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1111
Re: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
Argh.....
Playing with the VBA code that I'm translating, if I replace longstatus with 0, it works just fine.
Need a pulling hair out emoji....
Playing with the VBA code that I'm translating, if I replace longstatus with 0, it works just fine.
Need a pulling hair out emoji....
- Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:44 am
- Forum: API
- Topic: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1111
Re: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
Thanks. Well with the untyped nature of python, you have to assign a value to longstatus prior to usage. I've tried casting longstatus to an int using int(), but I get the following: pywintypes.com_error:(-2147352571, 'Type mismatch.', None, 13) I've looked around and can't find any reference to thi...
- Thu Sep 23, 2021 11:07 am
- Forum: API
- Topic: Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1111
Struggling with swAddMateError_e Enumeration in Python
Greetings all, I got a wild hair to apply my rudimentary python skills to write macros for SolidWorks. I'm making good progress. Some interesting gyrations to jump through, but I'm establishing a good book of knowledge to use in the future. But I'm hamstrung on the longstatus parameter used in AddMa...
- Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:32 am
- Forum: Misc CAD
- Topic: Alibre Cad
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1970
Re: Alibre Cad
It's not that good either. Lot's of bugs they don't seem interested in fixing and no configurations.Roasted By John wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:41 pm Fushion 360 isn't that bad - seems a lot elementary, lot of missing stuff
I gave up on it a while back and have stopped recommending it to folks.
bently