SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

User avatar
AlexLachance
Posts: 2174
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:14 am
Answers: 17
Location: Quebec
x 2353
x 2008

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by AlexLachance »

Bradfordzzz wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:17 am Maybe we need a new thread called "Second Thoughts" ?

Like .. on second thought .. I wish I wouldn't have installed 2022 at all!

and @AlexLachance ... before you say I told you so .. I know I know o[
It's a coin toss mate, no worries we've all been there.
berg_lauritz
Posts: 423
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 10:11 am
Answers: 6
x 439
x 233

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by berg_lauritz »

bentlybobcat wrote: Wed May 04, 2022 8:48 am ...

And then to spend the kind of coin they are spending on the entire 3DExperience website, it's quite frustrating.

The beauty of the 3dExperience website is it's broken and they know it. My interaction to get my 3DExperience account unlocked highlighted the frustration that middle level folks at Dassault have as well.

I'm coming to a point where I'm going to have to make a decision as to whether or not I'm going to keep my subscription active.

Unless things get straightened out pretty quickly over in Dassault-ville, it's prolly not going to happen. I've owned a seat of SolidWorks since '95, so some 17 years I've paid my annual stipend. It's just I really get the feeling they don't care about individual users any longer....
They are too invested to go back now. It still is all in for them!
The story of Ubers re-write from Objective C to Swift shows you that at one point you can not go back anymore.
I am just glad that SolidWorks Desktop still exists currently. But that safety net is becoming smaller & smaller.

Edit: Sorry for the hijacking of this topic.
Tera
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:58 am
Answers: 2
x 481
x 90

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tera »

Bradfordzzz wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:17 am Maybe we need a new thread called "Second Thoughts" ?
My second thought was to uninstall sp2 and go back to sp0.
I had serious problems with pack & go in sp2 concerning broken references. Back to sp0 and it seems I can use this feature again. Why should we pay this amount of money and still suffer?
User avatar
mattpeneguy
Posts: 1386
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:14 am
Answers: 4
x 2489
x 1899

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by mattpeneguy »

Tera wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 9:16 am My second thought was to uninstall sp2 and go back to sp0.
I had serious problems with pack & go in sp2 concerning broken references. Back to sp0 and it seems I can use this feature again. Why should we pay this amount of money and still suffer?
Because somebody has to pay for the 3DXP platform. Those 500+ developers don't work for free.
User avatar
bnemec
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:22 am
Answers: 10
Location: Wisconsin USA
x 2540
x 1398

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by bnemec »

Bradfordzzz wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:17 am Maybe we need a new thread called "Second Thoughts" ?

Like .. on second thought .. I wish I wouldn't have installed 2022 at all!

and @AlexLachance ... before you say I told you so .. I know I know o[
I'll play. On second thought, I wish we would have forgotten about PDM and stayed with Solid Edge.
berg_lauritz
Posts: 423
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 10:11 am
Answers: 6
x 439
x 233

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by berg_lauritz »

bnemec wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:05 pm I'll play. On second thought, I wish we would have forgotten about PDM and stayed with Solid Edge.
I agree. Implementing PDM properly is a hell of a job and if done poorly or not fully the costs outweigh the tiny benefits...
User avatar
bnemec
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:22 am
Answers: 10
Location: Wisconsin USA
x 2540
x 1398

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by bnemec »

berg_lauritz wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 4:36 pm I agree. Implementing PDM properly is a hell of a job and if done poorly or not fully the costs outweigh the tiny benefits...
I can attest to the latter. I have no experience with the former.
User avatar
Bradfordzzz
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 6:26 am
Answers: 0
Location: Windsor, ON
x 335
x 207

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Bradfordzzz »

Tera wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 9:16 am My second thought was to uninstall sp2 and go back to sp0.
I had serious problems with pack & go in sp2 concerning broken references. Back to sp0 and it seems I can use this feature again. Why should we pay this amount of money and still suffer?
Never thought I would say this .. but I miss Solidworks 2021
User avatar
Tapani Sjöman
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon May 03, 2021 9:53 am
Answers: 0
x 33
x 14

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tapani Sjöman »

When I select a component from an assembly tree, there shall pop an origo for moving or rotating that component. I don't like it. Can I disable that somehow? Could not found a solution by myself. :roll:
001_Selection_Origo.png
User avatar
mike miller
Posts: 878
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:38 pm
Answers: 7
Location: Michigan
x 1070
x 1231
Contact:

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by mike miller »

Starting to see the "future version" error since we're still on 2021 and I'm not hot to upgrade. So.......I just open SWX 2022 files directly in SE. Works like a charm. :D
He that finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for [Christ's] sake will find it. Matt. 10:39
Alin
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:46 am
Answers: 3
x 265
x 391

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Alin »

ellundo wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 7:30 am The temporary axis popping up is better but I still would like to be able to turn it off completely, or just delete that "feature".
Problem solved in SP2.0.
image.png
User avatar
Glenn Schroeder
Posts: 1518
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:43 am
Answers: 23
Location: southeast Texas
x 1754
x 2126

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Glenn Schroeder »

Alin wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:15 am Problem solved in SP2.0.
image.png
@Alin,

As you probably know, I was one of the people yelling loudest about the initial implementation of this "enhancement", but since they modified the behavior to build in the delay I've left that option turned on so I can use it occasionally. Before the delay I hated it with a purple passion.

Glenn
"On the days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, well, I have really good days."

Ray Wylie Hubbard in his song "Mother Blues"
User avatar
DennisD
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:04 am
Answers: 1
Location: Near Jacksonville, FL
x 1028
x 1467

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by DennisD »

Glenn Schroeder wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:06 pm @Alin,

As you probably know, I was one of the people yelling loudest about the initial implementation of this "enhancement", but since they modified the behavior to build in the delay I've left that option turned on so I can use it occasionally. Before the delay I hated it with a purple passion.

Glenn
Wasn't purple passion deadly, Glenn?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/boo ... 100143272/
Brick walls are there for a reason. The brick walls aren't there to keep us out. The brick walls are there to show us how badly we want things.
- - -Randy Pausch
Tera
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:58 am
Answers: 2
x 481
x 90

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tera »

Tapani Sjöman wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:52 am When I select a component from an assembly tree, there shall pop an origo for moving or rotating that component. I don't like it. Can I disable that somehow? Could not found a solution by myself. :roll:

001_Selection_Origo.png
You have to turn off Instant3D
User avatar
Tapani Sjöman
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon May 03, 2021 9:53 am
Answers: 0
x 33
x 14

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tapani Sjöman »

Thank you, Tera! This helped me a lot! ><
User avatar
SPerman
Posts: 2036
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:24 pm
Answers: 14
x 2207
x 1860
Contact:

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by SPerman »

SPerman wrote: Mon May 02, 2022 8:24 am There is one regression I found right away. (Search for SPR 1230978.)

In 2020 if you do a concentric mate, a 2nd set of breadcrumbs appears to allow you to flip the mate or lock the rotation. According to the SPR, that option disappears immediately after it appears. I know some people hated this feature, but I had become used to it and miss it, despite the extra clicks it requires at times.

(Kudos to the support tech at Trimech who actually did the work and attached my sn to the SPR. My previous VAR would have done less than the bare minimum.)
The following SPR (SolidWorks Performance Report) status has changed to Implemented.

SR# (Service Request): 1-24384108056
SPR#: 1230978
Description: Quick Mate lock rotation/flip alignment option disappears before making any selection.
Status: Implemented.
Version: 2023 PR1
-
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. -Douglas Adams
User avatar
AlexLachance
Posts: 2174
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:14 am
Answers: 17
Location: Quebec
x 2353
x 2008

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by AlexLachance »

SPerman wrote: Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:09 am The following SPR (SolidWorks Performance Report) status has changed to Implemented.

SR# (Service Request): 1-24384108056
SPR#: 1230978
Description: Quick Mate lock rotation/flip alignment option disappears before making any selection.
Status: Implemented.
Version: 2023 PR1
Lol, what will break in 2023 because they've 'fixed' this.
Tera
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:58 am
Answers: 2
x 481
x 90

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tera »

SPerman wrote: Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:09 am The following SPR (SolidWorks Performance Report) status has changed to Implemented.

SR# (Service Request): 1-24384108056
SPR#: 1230978
Description: Quick Mate lock rotation/flip alignment option disappears before making any selection.
Status: Implemented.
Version: 2023 PR1
Does it mean we have to upgrade to 2023 to be able to use something that was OK and they broke it?
Why not a hot fix?
Sometimes I think Solidworks is adding these kind of problems intentionally. They're just trying to make us pay for the next version.
User avatar
jcapriotti
Posts: 1852
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:39 pm
Answers: 29
Location: The south
x 1196
x 1984

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by jcapriotti »

@Tera Their SPR system only shows one version, so it could be fixed in 2022 sp4 or 5.

Some changes may require a change to the file structure meaning a backwards compatibility issue but this one appears to just be a UI change. Guess we'll see in a month or two.
Jason
Tera
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:58 am
Answers: 2
x 481
x 90

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by Tera »

jcapriotti wrote: Wed Jul 20, 2022 10:32 pm Guess we'll see in a month or two.
I hope so. Because I really can not make my boss sign for upgrading to 2023 after the mess they've caused in 2022.
User avatar
AlexLachance
Posts: 2174
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:14 am
Answers: 17
Location: Quebec
x 2353
x 2008

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by AlexLachance »

Tera wrote: Thu Jul 21, 2022 1:56 am I hope so. Because I really can not make my boss sign for upgrading to 2023 after the mess they've caused in 2022.
Ask your VAR for an escalation to get a quick fix created for the company you work for. It might be a hassle, but once you get it, if it works as you require it to, then it'll be easier to make your boss accept upgrading to 2023 to avoid staying with the mess 2022 seems to be.
User avatar
SPerman
Posts: 2036
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 4:24 pm
Answers: 14
x 2207
x 1860
Contact:

Re: SW 2022 SP2 - First Thoughts

Unread post by SPerman »

bentlybobcat wrote: Tue May 03, 2022 9:05 am I was looking through the release notes for v2022 and this turd jumped out:

"Reactivating SOLIDWORKS Perpetual Licenses
Starting with SOLIDWORKS 2022, commercial and educational customers who have purchased perpetual licenses of SOLIDWORKS products will be required to reactivate their licenses once a year. The licenses never expire but need to be reactivated periodically regardless of whether or not customers remain on subscription. Term licenses and student licenses are not affected."

Nice....
I couldn't get a license for PDM and learned I had to go to the license manager and re-activate. Not a big deal, once I figured out that was the problem.

https://help.solidworks.com/2023/englis ... Reactivate.
-
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. -Douglas Adams
Post Reply