Re: Does anyone actually use 3DExperience? Still waiting.......
Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 7:17 am
This one would have provided hours of entertainment on Jive...
A place FOR CAD users BY CAD users
https://cadforum.net/
But he has nothing to fear since no one could open his files.dave.laban wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 7:17 am This one would have provided hours of entertainment on Jive...
image.png
I couldn't resist.dave.laban wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 7:17 am This one would have provided hours of entertainment on Jive...
image.png
Glenn for the WIN!!!
I'm on a couple of aquarium forums. That reminded me of a member who swore he had a filter years ago that you started with some kind of siphon action and then it ran by itself, with no electrical power, air pump, etc. As you can imagine, some of us were skeptical. He said he was going to make up a prototype and report back when it was done. One of the gullible young members was even helping him with drawings.
I don't even have to log in over there to know how it's progressing...slowly, and in the wrong direction...But they'll get there one day...bnemec wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 9:19 am It just dawned on me that we're discussing how perpetual motion machines will never work no matter how hard the people believe or try in a thread asking if anyone is actually using 3DXprnc. Not that all PaaS are equal to perpetual motion machines, it's just that this specific PaaS seems to have about the same track record as perpetual motion machine; keep working on it and believe real hard...
There mantra: "Remember, no matter where you're going, there you are."mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 9:33 am I don't even have to log in over there to know how it's progressing...slowly, and in the wrong direction...But they'll get there one day...
Glenn, the patent process is a lengthy one...Ask @DennisD...Glenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 9:09 am I'm on a couple of aquarium forums. That reminded me of a member who swore he had a filter years ago that you started with some kind of siphon action and then it ran by itself, with no electrical power, air pump, etc. As you can imagine, some of us were skeptical. He said he was going to make up a prototype and report back when it was done. One of the gullible young members was even helping him with drawings.
Oddly enough, we haven't heard from him for a while.
Glenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 3:20 pm First cartoons, now rock music.
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... RH_0vyvBXQ
I've enjoyed watching this one fall apart. There's no way anything productive was going to happen based on the tone of the questionGlenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 8:37 am Here's another good one. https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... DGehmm_AbA
From the desperate, frustrated tone of the OP I had to check if that was a co-worker here trying to come to grips with life after changing CAD systems.
One thing that i had learnt (the hard way) when learning a new CAD system (in my case...CREO) is that..... forget whatever you know about your old cad system....Glenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 8:37 am Here's another good one. https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... DGehmm_AbA
That same concept applies to company CAD policies when the company changes CAD system, similar to when a user changes CAD system but with more digits after the currency sign.Zhen-Wei Tee wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 6:42 pm One thing that i had learnt (the hard way) when learning a new CAD system (in my case...CREO) is that..... forget whatever you know about your old cad system....
Things get so much better when u start from scratch
There is no such thing as fluent in one CAD = fluent in all CAD system...
You will need a minimum amount of time and training to get familiar with the UI and workflow when u switch CAD
(Ironically... a lot of time user are expected to "learn on the job"....)
This sounds like something I would do too lolSPerman wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:25 am I just stumbled across this on Reddit. More satisfied customers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SolidWorks/com ... 7o1a/f***/
DS is inadvertently creating a pirate army?AlexLachance wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 1:28 pm image.png
This sounds like something I would do too lol
It's looking more & more like this - also with CAD:
Here's a good one: https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... ZhqOure5igdave.laban wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 7:17 am This one would have provided hours of entertainment on Jive...
image.png
@josh (I think that is the right one) Brady is one of my favorite people on here.Glenn Schroeder wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 2:23 pm Here's a good one: https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... ZhqOure5ig
image.png
I don't know @DanPihlaja, I think @josh has a character flaw...He's not sarcastic enough...DanPihlaja wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 2:54 pm @josh (I think that is the right one) Brady is one of my favorite people on here.
I'd say the latter outweighs the former by a large margin...Hence, my comment.
Hmm....the link in that post from Kevin to another 3dx post goes nowhere except to the main page. So they already broke the link I guess, or they deleted the post.mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 11:48 am I'd say the latter outweighs the former by a large margin...Hence, my comment.
And it was a joke...Or it was meant to be, maybe it wasn't funny, but I meant it to be and definitely didn't mean any offense. The world could use more posts like this one:
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... jbbYjLmTZQ
image.png
I still chuckle when I read it...such subtlety.
The link works but only if you are already logged in.jcapriotti wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 12:49 pm Hmm....the link in that post from Kevin to another 3dx post goes nowhere except to the main page. So they already broke the link I guess, or they deleted the post.
I meant the link inside one of the replies, it just takes me to the main SolidWorks part of the community site. I thought maybe it would be post with more info on the tags.mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 1:43 pm The link works but only if you are already logged in.
If you read @josh's post it makes perfect sense, you should always be connected and logged into the platform, because being interconnected over there is most important, more important than work product, production, etc...The real question is, why were you logged out of the platform in the first place?...
Of course, appreciated the joke. No offense received.mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 11:48 am
And it was a joke...Or it was meant to be, maybe it wasn't funny, but I meant it to be and definitely didn't mean any offense.
That is so beautifully put by Josh, and when you read it, it can be hard for some to grasp the sarcasm because the early part of the post somewhat makes sense. It's just a shame that they forgot to prioritize knowledge and information as they worked on prioritizing connection and experience.mattpeneguy wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 11:48 am I'd say the latter outweighs the former by a large margin...Hence, my comment.
And it was a joke...Or it was meant to be, maybe it wasn't funny, but I meant it to be and definitely didn't mean any offense. The world could use more posts like this one:
https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexp ... jbbYjLmTZQ
image.png
I still chuckle when I read it...such subtlety.
That is exactly the issue the platform faces. Tags should be complimentary to categories. Should have been thought of as an additional tool to refine search, not as something to define categories.berg_lauritz wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 10:13 am I am honestly a big fan of tags. They are hopefully the future so that you don't need a 'file/folder-tree-system' anymore. I am just looking at my music library and my photo library on my phone right now and it's 100000000000000x better than with a file/folder system.
That does not mean that there should not be general categories to give you an overview and I agree that suggestions for tags should always appear.
It is, when appropriate. I've seen a few of your posts where the sarcasm was gloriously un-tempered, but only in situations where that was richly deserved.
It took me to the login page, but then it took me to the correct page.jcapriotti wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 12:49 pm Hmm....the link in that post from Kevin to another 3dx post goes nowhere except to the main page. So they already broke the link I guess, or they deleted the post.
The amount of files in a folder could theoretically be limitless. However, every time when the OS will access the specific folder to search for files, it will have to process all files in the folder. With less than 500 files, you might not notice any delays. But when you have tens of thousands of files in a single folder, a simple folder list command could take way too long. When these folders can be accessed through FTP, it will really be too slow...berg_lauritz wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 10:13 am so that you don't need a 'file/folder-tree-system' anymore. I am just looking at my music library and my photo library on my phone right now and it's 100000000000000x better than with a file/folder system.
You are right that this is not possible with i.e. how the Windows file explorer works (thank you for pointing that out!) but that is not necessarily true for other systems and that's the beauty of it. I wanted to point out that a tag system is something that (if implemented correctly) is superior to any file/folder system. The file/folder structure could be maintained additionally though!Tera wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 9:28 am The amount of files in a folder could theoretically be limitless. However, every time when the OS will access the specific folder to search for files, it will have to process all files in the folder. With less than 500 files, you might not notice any delays. But when you have tens of thousands of files in a single folder, a simple folder list command could take way too long. When these folders can be accessed through FTP, it will really be too slow...
NTFS can hold 4billion files per folder, it degrades relatively quickly. Around a thousand you will start to notice performance issues, several thousand and you'll see explorer appear to hang for a while. It's not only copy, accessing the filelist in general, search file will also take significant amount of time.
Of course the amount of time required to read, map, and process folder indexes may vary depending on hardware capabilities, file system fragmentation, memory, CPU, and cache performance. There is no prescribed limit to how many files you can place in an NTFS folder, but Microsoft recommends that you test your particular scenario to ensure that the time required to enumerate the contents of large folders does not affect application performance or uptime requirements. If necessary, add additional layers to the folder structure so there are a smaller number of files per folder.
You may want to reconsider the way you keep your files.
It needs "administration", just like other structures. Now, is there administration done on it, or is it all programmation that does the sorting? I'm guessing the latter, which is why the search sucks so bad over at 3DSWYM.SPerman wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 10:09 am Tags only work if everyone takes the time to enter them, and if there is some sort of consistent path to follow. They are meaningless if I tag something "drafting" and the user is searching for drawing. "If implemented correctly" is the key here, and almost impossible to pull off in an open environment like the SWamp.
From watching our CAD users access files as well as part records in ERP for the past 5 years I would say we find our stuff by drilling up and down the Contains/Where Used trees. One of the most common practices goes something like, "I'm looking for a part but don't know the number and to heck with guessing the description. But I know it's used with this other part number that I know." So it's a quick where used of the known part number then BOM search of one of the where used. So to us a side by side Where Used and Contains tree views with fast thumbnail/preview of the selected is more relevant than folder structures or Search tools.SPerman wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 10:09 am Tags only work if everyone takes the time to enter them, and if there is some sort of consistent path to follow. They are meaningless if I tag something "drafting" and the user is searching for drawing. "If implemented correctly" is the key here, and almost impossible to pull off in an open environment like the SWamp.
bnemec wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 10:26 am image.png
From watching our CAD users access files as well as part records in ERP for the past 5 years I would say we find our stuff by drilling up and down the Contains/Where Used trees. One of the most common practices goes something like, "I'm looking for a part but don't know the number and to heck with guessing the description. But I know it's used with this other part number that I know." So it's a quick where used of the known part number then BOM search of one of the where used. So to us a side by side Where Used and Contains tree views with fast thumbnail/preview of the selected is more relevant than folder structures or Search tools.
Come to think of it there's another thread here recently about this method of accessing files instead of the Search function.
Aren't there several Dilbert comics for this? I don't have any handy to paste.dave.laban wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:29 am So they're closing the Swym Enhancement Requests community to new ideas. I think the problem was determined to be "people are making too many enhancement requests" and the solution was "stop them making requests" not "fix the underlying structural, software and philosophical issues undermining the success of the platform".