Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

User avatar
jcapriotti
Posts: 1795
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:39 pm
Answers: 29
Location: The south
x 1138
x 1942

Re: Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

Unread post by jcapriotti »

KQuigley wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 7:06 pm Trying out other options.
Trying to understand in much more granular detail why we would need to continue with SolidWorks.
In truth, if Solidworks announced an end to maintenance and a move to 100% subscribers model at existing price structures we would just stop paying, buy new hardware and run it into the ground for 3-4 years and use that time to really test alternatives. Don’t forget (something that Solidworks definitely have) that every competitor out there is waiting for that moment as they know they will pick up easy wins by offering hard to resist switchover packages.
The problem is finding an alternative......everyone is moving to this software "lease" model....aka subscription. SolidWorks and Solid Edge are about the only ones left still offering a perpetual license.....in addition to subs.
Jason
gerard
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:24 am
Answers: 0
x 6
x 35

Re: Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

Unread post by gerard »

KQuigley wrote: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:24 pm :lol: Love how this forum autocorrected d*** …. As in Richard Sowar.
Wouldn't want to offend anyone, now would we?
User avatar
bnemec
Posts: 1876
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:22 am
Answers: 10
Location: Wisconsin USA
x 2473
x 1349

Re: Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

Unread post by bnemec »

jcapriotti wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 8:31 am The problem is finding an alternative......everyone is moving to this software "lease" model....aka subscription. SolidWorks and Solid Edge are about the only ones left still offering a perpetual license.....in addition to subs.
eh hem:
image.png
image.png (44.94 KiB) Viewed 439 times
User avatar
zxys001
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2021 10:08 am
Answers: 4
Location: Scotts Valley, Ca.
x 2270
x 977
Contact:

Re: Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

Unread post by zxys001 »

bnemec wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:33 am eh hem:
image.png
"perpetually FREE license"

I hope FreeCad does as Blender and let the community move to run over these greedy sobees. ><
"Democracies aren't overthrown; they're given away." -George Lucas
“We only protect what we love, we only love what we understand, and we only understand what we are taught.” - Jacques Cousteau
User avatar
bnemec
Posts: 1876
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:22 am
Answers: 10
Location: Wisconsin USA
x 2473
x 1349

Re: Onshape's downsides from a SolidWorks user perspective?

Unread post by bnemec »

zxys001 wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 10:36 am "perpetually FREE license"

I hope FreeCad does as Blender and let the community move to run over these greedy sobees. ><
Problem is as soon as (if) it gets popular and poses itself as a threat to the powers the solution is for one of them to buy it and crush it. Has happened to other open systems, unfortunately money still talks. I just cannot help but wonder what it would be like if all the time that's been squandered by users in all these forums trying to solve problems and write utilities and macros... If all that time was put into planning, testing and programming improvements in some open source thing like FreeCAD how good it would be. Yeah there would be forks because no one can agree, but good components could be merged back in. At least I would have control over the software that my files are in. If the main goes to heck the company I work for can keep our fork and pay some people (hired or contract) to maintain it. Likely wouldn't cost much more than subs. I digress.
Post Reply