Limits of Solidworks FEA
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 11:14 am
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone has experience with the limits of Solidworks FEA. My current employer has used it for years but has also outsourced larger studies to a consultant that uses ANSYS.
Typically, anything that we have been able to run ourselves has been okay, with only minor discrepancies with ANSYS results. It has only been for when the models get so large that we do not have the computing power to run them that we have really relied on ANSYS.
But recently we have found a different problem. We have a long weldment (symmetric, with half shown below) that gets a number of hydraulic cylinders and other weldment attached. We have been looking at the deflection in the long tube (around 26 feet) and only get around 63% of the deflection using Solidworks that our consultant gets using ANSYS. We see around 1.1" and they get 1.75". We measured one under load in the plant and ANSYS is correct.
After having gone over the ANSYS model, boundary conditions, and loads, in depth with the consultant we cannot find a difference between the two setups.
We do have large displacement activated when we run the study.
Is there simply too much going on for Solidworks to get this right? Or is there something special that we should be doing with large members under deflection? Any other thoughts?
Sorry, can't share much more of the geometry for IP purposes.
I am wondering if anyone has experience with the limits of Solidworks FEA. My current employer has used it for years but has also outsourced larger studies to a consultant that uses ANSYS.
Typically, anything that we have been able to run ourselves has been okay, with only minor discrepancies with ANSYS results. It has only been for when the models get so large that we do not have the computing power to run them that we have really relied on ANSYS.
But recently we have found a different problem. We have a long weldment (symmetric, with half shown below) that gets a number of hydraulic cylinders and other weldment attached. We have been looking at the deflection in the long tube (around 26 feet) and only get around 63% of the deflection using Solidworks that our consultant gets using ANSYS. We see around 1.1" and they get 1.75". We measured one under load in the plant and ANSYS is correct.
After having gone over the ANSYS model, boundary conditions, and loads, in depth with the consultant we cannot find a difference between the two setups.
We do have large displacement activated when we run the study.
Is there simply too much going on for Solidworks to get this right? Or is there something special that we should be doing with large members under deflection? Any other thoughts?
Sorry, can't share much more of the geometry for IP purposes.